So, how does the model work?
Basically it’s as easy as looking at the following chart based on the situational variables and Leadership Styles
In simple terms, one has to identify the situational variables that lead to any of the eight possible situations characterized on the chart. Then according to the situation you can say what particular leadership style is best suited to that situation.
What’s so cool about this model?
The model helps to know if a particular leader will either fit or not into a particular work setting.
Ups and Downs of Situational Leadership
The Up Side
- Lots of empirical research,support the model.
- It shifted the focus towards the leadership context mainly to the link between the leader and situations
- It’s predictive. For a particular situation (any among eight) it tells you what leadership style suits best
The Down Side
- Doesn’t explain how a leader’s LPC score affects group performance.
- The model neglects medium LPC scores. It only considers High and Low LPC leaders, while most of the leader exhibit a medium LPC score.
- Cumbersome to apply. In a particular work setting it might be difficult to identify the situational variables and the leadership style. It’s necessary to assess 4 different variables before applying the model.
- It doesn’t explainwhat an organisation has to do, or need to do when a leader style doesn’t match the situational variables.
Summary
A contingency theory is one that tries to match the leader’s style with the setting or situation the leader is living. In other words, it tries to find a “contingent” (matching) leadership style to a particular work setting.
There are several contingency theories but the most well known is from Fred Fiedler and the LPC (Least Preferred Coworker) Model. This model takes into account the leadership style and 3 situational variables: leader-member relationship, task structure, and position power. With these four factors Fiedler elaborated a model that defines 8 possible scenarios or work settings where only one of the two leadership styles can be succesful on each of the scenarios.
Further Investigation and References
Northouse, P.G. (2004) “Leadership Theory and Practice” (3rd Ed)
Sage Publications
Lussier, R.N.; Achua, C.F. (2004) “Leadership: Theory, Application, Skill Development” (2nd Ed)
South-Western
Yukl, G.A. (2002) “Leadership in Organizations” (5th Ed)
Prentice-Hall
Pages: 1 2
1 comment
[...] Several theories can be referred as contingency theories. A contingency theory is one that tries to match the leader’s style with the context. Then, an effective leader depends (is contingent) on matching the style with his setting. The most renowned contingency theory was developed by Fred Fiedler in the 1960s. He developed a scale (LPC) to rate a leader and define his style. On the other hand, for situations he centers his attention on three variables: leader-member relations, task structure and position power. Together these three variables determined the favorableness of situations in the organization. Matching the favorableness of a situation with a leaders LPC then could predict the efectiveness of a leader. (Want to learn more?, check The Contingency Theory) [...]
Leave a Comment